Bulls redshirt freshman QB Jordan McCloud won the starting spot over veteran Blake Barnett two weeks ago, and will keep his spot under center this week as the Bulls take on conference opponent UConn.
However, the decision to keep McCloud at QB1 was not due to last weeks performance against SMU. If that were the case, it would probably be Barnett, who jump-started the offense with three touchdown passes on three straight drives in the second half of a 48-21. But unfortunately, he suffered a high ankle sprain against the Mustangs that has rendered him unable to practice.
Kerwin Bell says Blake Barnett (high-ankle sprain) hasn't practiced, but Jordan McCloud (wrist contusion) has. He's hopeful of having Barnett available Saturday at UConn, but looks as if McCloud is the guy. @USFFootball
— Joey Knight (@TBTimes_Bulls) October 2, 2019
Barnett completed 13 of 21 passes for 222 yards, his 10th career 200-yard passing game, and added 24 rushing yards in an valiant relief effort. However, it was too little too late for the Bulls last Saturday night, after getting steamrolled in the first 3 quarters and allowing SMU to score 41 unanswered points.
So it looks like they’ve got to stick with the Tampa Native, who was seriously tested in his second ever career start. McCloud was sacked six times and turned the ball over in the end zone on a 16-play, 77-yard drive, that could’ve tied the game up and turned the momentum in the Bulls favor early in the game.
McCloud was out in the second half after suffering a wrist injury, but has been able to practice at full speed this week.
The Bulls have had a rocky season all around, highlighted by tottering quarterback performances, making it impossible for the offensive staff to know which guy will be the one to spark something on offense.
After two disappointing performances by Barnett to start the season, McCloud made his starting debut for the Bulls in their matchup against South Carolina State. He finished the game throwing for 217 yards with three touchdowns, and rushing for 56 yards. Most importantly, he proved to be shiftier behind a spotty O-Line, which allowed him to complete more plays than Blake Barnett has this season.
But as mentioned above, this past weekend proved otherwise.
Right now, the team is in a poor position, with a dismal 1-3 record, and two injured quarterbacks heading into the heart of conference play.
Sophomore quarterback Kirk Rygol will most likely be the backup if Barnett is a non-option, and McCloud’s wrist starts to give him trouble.
Given all of these setbacks, history is on USF’s side against the Huskies as they hold a commanding 11-5 series record. The Bulls have beaten the UConn seven times in a row, with the last USF loss being back in 2011.
UConn enters into the game with a 1-3 record for the season, matching the Bulls, with two 20+ point losses from Indiana and UCF.
So, if McCloud can return to his third week performance and his wrist can hold up, there’s potential for this to be a nice bounce back week for Charlie Strong’s struggling program.
USF fires head coach Charlie Strong
It’s official… Charlie Strong has coached his final game as the USF head football coach. The news comes just two days after the Bulls humiliating 34-7 loss to rival UCF in the War on I-4 on Friday.
BREAKING: Staff members at USF being informed Charlie Strong is out, per source.
— Dan Wolken (@DanWolken) December 1, 2019
Confirmed: Charlie Strong out at #USF
— Joey Knight (@TBTimes_Bulls) December 1, 2019
Strong was hired in December of 2016 after being let go from Texas. In his first year in Tampa, he went 10-2 in year one after inheriting a star-studded roster from former head coach Willie Taggart.
Since then, the Strong era has been anything but strong for the past season and a half. Their most recent loss to rival UCF was their fourth straight to end the year and Strong’s team limped to the finish line at 4 – 8.
Strong entered the year with lots of speculation and it only grew worse when they opened the season with a humiliating 49 – 0 loss to Wisconsin. That led to a road loss at lowly Georgia Tech and being wiped out by SMU and Navy previously. Then, they were blown out at home by AAC west division champion, Memphis, 49-10 on senior day. And, that led to UCF ending their season with another rout Friday.
When you combine this season with losing the remaining six games a year ago, that’s 14 losses in the last 18 games played for Strong’s teams. Friday night was also the fifth loss by 27 points or more for USF this season.
After the game, Strong was asked whether he believed he would be back for a fourth year, to which he responded, “I have no idea.”
Since then, the media has been waiting to see if USF Athletic Director Michael Kelly, who was hired last year, would get rid of the former Texas and Louisville coach or give him one final shot to turn it around in 2020? It looks like he’s decided it would be better to start fresh and give fans something to be hopeful for heading into the off season.
Strong is reportedly owed at least $5 million for the remaining two years on his five-year deal that he agreed to in December of 2016.
Zemek- sad If Charlie Strong’s head coaching career is done
Charlie Strong very likely coached his last game as a major college football head coach on Friday night. South Florida was easily handled by the UCF Knights, concluding another bowl-less season in Tampa. South Florida’s defense played quite respectably.
USF’s offense had very little to offer, a microcosm of a season in which USF’s defense delivered very competent performances against the elite teams in the American Athletic Conference.
USF contained Temple. It stymied Cincinnati. It didn’t let Memphis run wild, though the Tigers – in line to be the champions of the Group of Five, a very strong team in 2019 – eventually figured things out on offense.
On Friday, USF fans privately worried that UCF would hang 50 or more points and humiliate the Bulls. That did not happen. Holding UCF to 34 points in Orlando is a decent showing not just for USF, but any UCF opponent. Ask Memphis from the past two AAC Championship Games.
Charlie Strong hasn’t lost his touch coaching defense, but when fielding an offense, he struggles profoundly, which explains why his head coaching career has likely ended. A decision hasn’t yet been made on his job status at the time this article is being written – Saturday morning, Nov. 30 – but it figures to be in the near future.
When the head coaching career of Charlie Strong is viewed in full, the first chapter will contain this fundamental thesis: If Strong didn’t have a great quarterback to cover the limitations of his offensive staff, he struggled. That is the most central reality of Strong’s existence as a head coach, when he had to be accountable for his offense, not just his defense.
Teddy Bridgewater enabled Strong’s Louisville tenure to be a success. Bridgewater made so many spectacular plays and rescued UL in its most urgent moments that Strong felt he could bring offensive coordinator Shawn Watson to Texas. We could all see that Bridgewater thrived in spite of Watson at Louisville, instead of Watson doing unique things to unlock Teddy’s talents. This is why Strong didn’t thrive at Texas (in addition to having a problem with the locker room culture he inherited from Mack Brown).
Strong’s most embarrassing moment at Texas was a forced march to Tulsa to beg and plead for the services of Sterlin Gilbert, then on the Golden Hurricane’s staff, to make him the new offensive coordinator after Watson and Jay Norvell didn’t work out. Gilbert did improve Strong’s Texas offense, enough to warrant a retained job when Strong moved to South Florida.
Yet, in the bigger picture, the same refrain remained true: The quarterbacks, more than the offensive coordinators, enabled Strong’s offenses to become great on the rare occasions Strong fielded a formidable offense.
It was clear in 2017 that Quinton Flowers was the main reason USF’s offense was special. Those Bulls – which Strong inherited from Willie Taggart – were loaded at the skill positions. Elite quarterback, running back, and wide receiver play mattered more than any scheme or design.
Why can we say this so confidently, you might ask?
When, in 2018, Sterlin Gilbert took over an offense without the 2017 stable of talent in Tampa, he flopped. Gilbert never understood how to adjust to changing circumstances. Late in the 2018 season – against a UCF team which lost star quarterback McKenzie Milton in the first half – South Florida had a real chance to win if its offense could make timely plays in big situations.
Gilbert’s third-down and red-zone play-calling, however, were shockingly conservative and unimaginative Gilbert’s worst game of the 2018 season came in the most high-profile moment against the opponent USF fans wanted to beat more than any other.
Strong was once again shopping for a new offensive coordinator before his third year at a program, just like Texas. Kerwin Bell was his choice. Clearly, as we have seen in 2019, the former Florida Gator quarterback could not turn the tide in Tampa.
We are left with a basic reality that Strong knows how to coach defense, but can’t find the right formula on offense. This does not make Strong unique.
What is sad about the likely end of Charlie Strong’s head coaching career is that it started so late. For reasons not related to football (let’s put it that way), Strong wasn’t able to be a head coach until age 50, despite decades (plural) as an accomplished position coach and defensive coordinator. He didn’t coach his first game as a head coach – with Louisville in the late summer of 2010 – until he was 50.
That was – and is, and will remain – an outrage.
Imagine if Strong had gotten his first head coaching job at age 40 instead of 50. He would be 49 right now, not 59. He could go to a Sun Belt or Conference USA program and start over. Three or four years of good work might put him in the mix for an AAC job in his mid-50s. However, because he was allowed inside the head coaching game at a later age, it is hard to see an athletic director picking up the phone.
I could be wrong, but a lot of people inside the industry doubt this.
Yes, being a great defensive coordinator – Strong will have his choice of job if he wants back into the coordinator game – is a good life. There is no shame in being a mediocre head coach and a great coordinator. However, Charlie Strong wasn’t given the same chances to succeed in head coaching that others were. Race was undeniably an element of his story, and that is a black mark on college football, in more ways than one.
If you think race has nothing to do with Strong’s story, let me offer with this very simple concluding note: On the same day that Strong very likely coached his last college game as a head coach, Tom Herman ended a hugely disappointing 7-5 season at the University of Texas, Strong’s previous employer.
Herman completed his third season at Texas in humiliating fashion. Herman has been better than Strong, but hardly by a large and significant margin. Herman will get the fourth season in Austin Strong never received.
Does this mean Strong shouldn’t have been fired? One can make a reasonable argument that Texas had to let Strong go after the Longhorns lost to Kansas. Herman merely allowed 48 points to Kansas this season, winning 50-48. Yes, Herman was and is better… but not by much. He, however, gets the benefit of the doubt. Not Strong.
One can simultaneously say that Charlie Strong didn’t measure up as a head coach, that he was wronged by the industry in which he has worked, and that he can still make a very good life as a defensive coordinator in the years ahead.
This story isn’t a happy one, and yet it is also a story of first-world problems. It is a story which is immensely complicated. Charlie Strong didn’t seek out these complications; they found him, more than anything else.