Good news for all those Buccaneers fans anxious to see Tampa Bay take Florida State running back Dalvin Cook with its first pick in the 2017 NFL Draft next Thursday night.
The chances of Cook still being on the board when the Bucs first pick comes around at No. 19 overall appear to be increasing. The bad news is they’re increasing for all the wrong reasons.
According, to NFL Network analyst Mike Mayock, Cook “has taken on some water’’ and is definitely in danger of sinking not just to the bottom of the first round but all the way into the second round of the draft.
Mayock’s comments came during an interview on the Rich Eisen Show on Thursday night in which he said Cook’s “off-field character stuff’’ was the cause of his descent down draft boards.
Cook’s rap sheet includes one citation for a BB gun incident that left some car windows broken, another for chaining up three pit bull puppies by the neck and a domestic violence charge he was later acquitted of.
The fact Cook has already had a couple of shoulder surgeries and has never really embraced the blocking aspect of playing the running back position aren’t helping his cause either.
Nor is it helpful that Stanford running back Christian McCaffrey has “picked up a lot of heat,’’ according to Mayock and is now on track to be the second back to come off the board after LSU’s Leonard Fournette.
By the way, Mayock says he sees Fournette going either fourth overall to the Jaguars or eighth overall to the Panthers, who will probably take McCaffrey if Fournette is already gone, Mayock said.
That would leave the Eagles at No. 14 as the only running-back needy team ahead of the Bucs, but you get the feeling from listening to Mayock that he believes Tampa Bay would be better off taking a tight end.
Mayock says he believes three tight ends – Albamaa’s O.J. Howard, Miami’s David Njoku and Mississippi’s Evan Engram – could be selected in the first round but he also believes the best of those may slide a bit.
“(Howard) is as good a mixed combo tight end with the ability to block in line and get down the field intermediate and deep as I’ve seen in recent years,’’ Mayock said.
“I think he’s going to be every bit as good as Greg Olsen. He has that kind of ability, but he could slide a little bit because he’s not as sexy as some of the picks.’’
Why hasn’t Florida State named their new coach?
Why hasn’t Florida State announced the hire of a new head football coach? It is a legitimate question to ask as Conference Championship Weekend approaches.
The early signing period comes closer, and the Seminoles know they need to nail down recruits to give themselves a fighting chance in 2020 and, more realistically, 2021. The more this head coaching search drags out – now that we are in December – the worse it looks for Florida State.
Moreover, the whole point (or at least the main point) of firing Willie Taggart a few weeks before the end of the regular season was precisely to get a head start on the head coaching search and find the right man for the right price in a precarious time for Seminole football.
If Florida State doesn’t have a coach firmly secured by Sunday morning – before the College Football Playoff teams and New Year’s Six bowl assignments are announced – it will be buried in the news cycle. Announcing a hire late Sunday night or early Monday morning won’t create the same splash and will certainly come across as being “late” in a meaningful sense. FSU won’t get the maximum amount of attention and publicity it needs.
The clock really is ticking. Yes, it is better to be late than to settle for a terrible hire. Florida State (and any other school in its position) is better served by getting the right coach late in a carousel cycle than to be stuck with the wrong man and making the hire “on time,” before Sunday afternoon.
We can all understand the bigger picture, though: Florida State, a program of great stature and significance, should be able to get a good hire AND be on time. The Seminoles ought to be able to walk and chew gum at the same time.
The conventional wisdom – or at least, one of several prevailing thoughts if there isn’t majority agreement on this point – is that Florida State will wait until after Saturday’s AAC Championship Game between Cincinnati and Memphis to announce the hire of Memphis coach Mike Norvell.
If this IS in fact the case (we’ll see, one way or the other), Florida State will have gotten one of the better options in the coaching carousel. Norvell’s (above) name has been thrown about for a long time at Power Five schools. His arrival would certainly offer the promise of an elite offense (and strong quarterback development) returning to Tallahassee.
It wouldn’t be a home-run, but it would be viewed as a reasonably good hire under complicated circumstances, a move which could certainly work if Norvell plays his cards right.
The bigger question – and potential problem – for FSU is if a Norvell deal has NOT been lined up, and if the program is scrambling. Then we’re in a different landscape with a lot more uncertainty.
We talk about this larger topic at this time every year: In a coaching search, there is always a prime target. If that target is secured (in this case Norvell), great.
If not, are you – as an athletic director – ready with your Plan B? Is Dave Coburn, armed with his search firm, ready?
We’re about to find out if FSU has its Plan A firmly secured, or if the school has its Plan B ready to go before the College Football Playoff announcement.
Or, if FSU has botched this hire completely by letting others who started later get coaches out from under them.
Florida-FSU wouldn’t be what it is without Bowden and Spurrier
It isn’t a crime against humanity. It isn’t the foremost outrage to be found in the world, in North America in the United States, in college athletics, in college football, or even in the state of Florida.
There are much bigger problems, many more severe outrages, to be found in the world… but this IS a crime: An ESPN “30 for 30” film on the Bobby Bowden-Steve Spurrier rivalry hasn’t been made.
I don’t have a problem with the fact that two 30 for 30 movies on the Miami Hurricanes were made. Miami football was a remarkable story with electric characters who lived unforgettable lives as collegiate athletes. The U did require two parts. That’s perfectly fine. I enjoyed the first one more than the second, but I’m glad both parts were made, and I am happy both parts exist as part of the treasure trove of documentary films on college football.
However, if The U gained two separate films on the “30 for 30” documentary franchise, “how in the Sam Hill” does the Bowden-Spurrier rivalry not have ONE film?
Bowden and Spurrier were obviously great coaches. They were iconic figures. They were also the ultimate pillars, the single most important figures in the football histories of their respective schools.
There was no Florida State football – not in any consequential sense, at any rate – before Bobby Bowden.
Similarly, Florida owned a significant national presence only to the extent that Steve Spurrier was in some way involved. His Heisman Trophy season in 1966, followed by his ascent to UF head coach, made Florida football what it was
Bowden and Spurrier weren’t great coaches who were mere drops in the ocean, small particles of a much larger rivalry with many epic chapters before and after. No, they WERE the rivalry between Florida and Florida State. We are still waiting for another coaching clash to come remotely close to that.
Urban Meyer – the other coaching giant in the history of FSU-UF football – didn’t have Bowden at his best when he coached the Gators. Jimbo Fisher didn’t have a worthy counterpart earlier this decade. Florida State will try to hire a coach who can match wits with Dan Mullen and create something special, but nothing is guaranteed.
This magnifies what Bowden and Spurrier brought to Noles-Gators, and to college football… but it doesn’t begin to tell the whole story.
Whether you believe either coach’s outward persona – Bobby’s aw-shucks, dadgummit veneer or Spurrier’s unvarnished competitive cockiness – is beside the point. These two men carried themselves in unique ways.
Bowden was the ultimate charmer – think “Bear Bryant but with sunshine and giggles” – while Spurrier was the resentful grudge-holding score-settler whose long memory fueled his ambitions and made him the great coach he was.
Florida State-Florida wasn’t just hugely significant at its height in the 1990s; it was colorful, emotional, original, fresh, and endlessly honest. The hatred was naked, not hidden; outwardly expressed, not repressed.
FSU-UF didn’t merely matter a great deal; it was the rivalry which, in its heyday, was so refreshingly free of pretense or manufactured controversy. The Noles and Gators arrived at – and built – their hatred honestly, not through cheap or artificial avenues or devices.
If Woody Hayes and Bo Schembechler had the Ten-Year War at Ohio State and Michigan from 1969 through 1978, Bowden and Spurrier had the Twelve-Year War from 1990 through 2001.
The U should have two “30 for 30s.”
That isn’t the problem.
Bobby Bowden and Steve Spurrier not having one, at the end of 2019?
It’s a crime… not the worst crime, but a crime nonetheless.
Jacksonville Jaguars1 week ago
Mystery surrounds retired Jaguars LB Smith Wednesday night
Florida State Seminoles1 day ago
Why hasn’t Florida State named their new coach?
CFB4 hours ago
Report- Ole Miss on verge of hiring FAU coach Lane Kiffin
USF Bulls6 days ago
Zemek- sad If Charlie Strong’s head coaching career is done